vRA 7.3 Notice
If using vRA 7.3.0, please upgrade to VMware's vRA 7.3.1.
- If on vRA 7.3.0, please login to the vRA Appliance and verify Appliance Version is 126.96.36.1997 Build. If not on the 188.8.131.527 Build, please upgrade to vRA 7.3.1. If on the 184.108.40.2067 Build, the VMware vRA Hotfix has been applied that is required for SovLabs.
VMware fixed an issue with form field validations that affects all of SovLabs' provided XaaS forms. VMware also fixed a vRA 7.3.0 vRO CAFE bug related to VMware vRA plug-in for vRO.
vRA 7.4 Notice
The minimum SovLabs plug-in version compatible for VMware's vRA 7.4 is 2018.1.4.
vRA 7.5 Notice
The minimum SovLabs plug-in version compatible for VMware's vRA 7.5 is 2018.2.6.
*Customers currently on a previous version of the SovLabs Plug-in (e.g. 2018.x, 2017.x)
A new SovLabs 2019.x license key is needed in order to use the SovLabs 2019.x Plug-in.
If you are interested in upgrading to 2019.x, please GO HERE to request the new SovLabs 2019.x key.
Prior to performing a new install, please complete all of the pre-requisites via: docs.sovlabs.com - Getting Started
Please follow our Upgrade steps when performing an upgrade of our SovLabs Plug-in
Added supported versions: 4.6, 4.7 and 4.8 into dropdown for SovLabs SolarWinds Endpoint
Red Hat Satellite
Added supported version 6.4 into dropdown for SovLabs Red Hat Satellite Configuration
vSphere DRS, vSphere Snapshot Management and VM Tagging:
Added 6.7 in supported version dropdown for SovLabs vCenter Endpoint. SovLabs certified vCenter 6.7 in 2018.1.5
- Ansible Tower
- Fixed "Ansible Tower Execute AnsibleTowerProfile Job Template" issue when more than 1 Ansible Tower Inventory Profile exists that points to the same Organization and Inventory name
- ServiceNow CMDB with ServiceNow Discovery
- Fixed the issue where duplicate CIs in ServiceNow resulted after running ServiceNow vCenter Discovery. Updated the "vcenter_uuid" field in the default templates to be "vm_instance_uuid" to avoid duplicate entries.
|Type||Known Issue + Workaround|
|All||Failed to get latest version of the resource element SovLabs Plug-in 2019.6.0 Release Notes
Version inconsistency between cache and db detected in repo for _______ cached version 0.0.__ db version 0.0.___
Workaround: If the issue occurs consistently, please notify SovLabs immediately. This will be resolved in the upcoming GA release of the SovLabs Plug-in, expected May 2019.
|vRA/vRO Clustering for vRA 7.3 and vRA 7.4
||vRA does not consistently persist XaaS items to inventory (independent of SovLabs) even though the vRO workflow related to item creation completes successfully.
Workaround: None. SovLabs is pursuing this issue with VMware GSS at the highest priority.
SovLabs KB Article 6000197373
|Custom Naming||Unable to rename deployments in vRA 7.x due to vRA Platform limitation.
The deployment name defaults to the blueprint name appended by a dash and an auto-generated 8-digit number (e.g. blueprintName-12345678)
Workaround: The deployment name can be influenced by adding a vRA Custom Property at the composite blueprint level (versus at the machine component in the blueprint) with:
|Manage Credentials for Puppet Open Source with Foreman||Unable to update a credential that is tied to Puppet Open Source with Foreman
Workaround: Update the Foreman Master or Foreman Agent and create a new credential directly inline and submit.
|F5||Issue: A nested vRA blueprint with the F5 virtual component in the child vRA blueprint that defines the value for Pool Health Monitors field fails with a: Status Code 400 'The value for the 'poolHealthMonitors' field should be among the permitted value' for vRA 7.2. This issue does not occur for vRA 7.3 nor for a single (non-nested) blueprint.
Workaround: Do not define (pin) the value for Pool Health Monitors (or any field that is Array/String) on the F5 Virtual component in the child blueprint for a nested blueprint.
vRA 7.4, 2018.1.4
During provisioning for vRA 7.4, vRO server.log will log errors when the SovLabs RESTipe executes a vRO workflow. The error logs are benign and can be ignored. vRO workflows are executed successfully via SovLabs RESTipes.
Issue: When defining multiple F5 virtual components and different VIPs are tied to use the same Pool Name (often when manually defining the Pool Name), the VIPs and the Pool is not removed from F5 when destroying the deployment even though the Pool is empty.
Workaround: Please try to keep a 1:1 relationship between a VIP and Pool. A circular dependency exists when trying to remove the VIPs tied to the same Pool and proper disposal cannot take place.
|Notifications||Updating a Notification Configuration's Configuration label will create a duplicate vRO Inventory item with the previous name. Not allowing the customer to create another Notification Configuration with the previous name.
Temporary Workaround: Please run the vRO Workflow: SovLabs > Notifications > vRA ASD > Notification > Delete Notification Configuration and choose the Notification Configuration with the previous name to delete.
|vSphere Snapshot Management||If using vSphere Snapshot Management with any of the Backup as a Service modules (Cohesity, Rubrik, Veeam) may result in an email notification of a Backup as a Service snapshot.
If the Backup as a Service snapshot lives beyond deletion time set in Snapshot Configuration, will get deleted.
|Property Toolkit||Day2 on vRA VM "Manage Properties (SovLabs Property Toolkit) does not have a correct reflection of the fields: Hidden, Encrypted, Show in Request for a Property when the Action field is Update Existing Property.
Workaround: Please check the checkbox during an Update of a Property on a VM for any of the applicable fields: Hidden, Encrypted, Show in Request and then Submit.
Property Toolkit vRA Catalog Item: Entity Property Assignment and Reporting has an issue when creating a new vRA Blueprint Custom Property and setting it to "Overridable = false" will create the vRA Blueprint Custom Property as "Overridable = true"
Workaround: Please manually set "Overridable = false" on the vRA Blueprint
Property Toolkit dynamically setting an Encrypted property via "SVL_" vRA Property Group will error out.
Workaround: Please set the Encrypted property on an appropriate vRA Entity. Currently, unable to set Encrypted properties dynamically on the machine.
|Puppet Open Source with Foreman (starting from release 2018.2.4)||The Host Parameters field is optional. When no Host Parameters are defined, an error stack trace for null pointer exception is in the vRO logs.
Workaround: None, the error stack trace is benign. The provisioning succeeds and the machine is added correctly into Foreman.